DaveDays
Miley Cyrus Stalker
2008 Jul 22 • 203
153 ₧
|
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2009 Aug 5 at 23:03 UTC
|
|
|
aaronjer
*****'n Admin
2005 Mar 21 • 5105
1,227 ₧
|
I don't know who that is. Is she supposed to be dumb, or like, SUPER SMART?
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2009 Aug 5 at 23:39 UTC
— Ed. 2009 Aug 5 at 23:39 UTC
|
|
|
jrkookid
Half Irish, half NOT FUNNY
2007 May 27 • 1415
110 ₧
|
Rihanna is a singer.
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2009 Aug 6 at 01:01 UTC
|
|
|
DaveDays
Miley Cyrus Stalker
2008 Jul 22 • 203
153 ₧
|
Rihanna is a singer who was beat up by a rapper nammed chris brown, it was in big news.... anyway, when it says "can you beat her?" I was loling!
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2009 Aug 6 at 02:35 UTC
|
|
|
|
DaveDays said: Rihanna is a singer who was beat up by a rapper nammed chris brown, it was in big news.... anyway, when it says "can you beat her?" I was loling!
Asshole. She probably sees that and all the memories come back and she end up wanting to cut her self and cries all night long gagging on her warm milk trying to sing Umbrella.
Make awkward sexual advances, not war. Down Rodeo said: Dammit, this was the one place that didn't have this, but noooooo, molkman pisses all over that 
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2009 Aug 6 at 02:52 UTC
|
|
|
aaronjer
*****'n Admin
2005 Mar 21 • 5105
1,227 ₧
|
I'm in favor of beating women. Especially when they're minorities.
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2009 Aug 6 at 05:29 UTC
|
|
|
|
aaronjer said: I'm in favor of beating women. Especially when they're minors.
FTFY.
This is the first FTFY I've done on the Internet BTW. LOL.
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2009 Aug 7 at 00:29 UTC
|
|
|
|
aaronjer said: I'm in favor of beating women. Especially when they're minorities.
You dick needs to be chopped off. If you even have one.
Make awkward sexual advances, not war. Down Rodeo said: Dammit, this was the one place that didn't have this, but noooooo, molkman pisses all over that
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2009 Aug 7 at 00:37 UTC
|
|
|
aaronjer
*****'n Admin
2005 Mar 21 • 5105
1,227 ₧
|
I'm fairly certain that women can't be minors, as they'd be girls in the situation. However, I like where you're going with this!
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2009 Aug 7 at 02:02 UTC
|
|
|
DaveDays
Miley Cyrus Stalker
2008 Jul 22 • 203
153 ₧
|
Havokk Edge said: DaveDays said: Rihanna is a singer who was beat up by a rapper nammed chris brown, it was in big news.... anyway, when it says "can you beat her?" I was loling!
Asshole. She probably sees that and all the memories come back and she end up wanting to cut her self and cries all night long gagging on her warm milk trying to sing Umbrella. I KNOW! ISNT IT GREAT???
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2009 Aug 7 at 06:42 UTC
|
|
|
|
DaveDays said: Havokk Edge said: DaveDays said: Rihanna is a singer who was beat up by a rapper nammed chris brown, it was in big news.... anyway, when it says "can you beat her?" I was loling!
Asshole. She probably sees that and all the memories come back and she end up wanting to cut her self and cries all night long gagging on her warm milk trying to sing Umbrella. I KNOW! ISNT IT GREAT??? lol i forgot all about that .. it was kinda funny
melloyellow582 said: I post sometimes, to make a point.
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2009 Aug 7 at 18:34 UTC
|
|
|
molkman
Owner of George Washington's Prototype Mittens
2005 May 2 • 2066
404 ₧
|
I enjoyed the original picture. As soon as I noticed it was the ad that was supposed to be the point in the picture and stopped waiting for the rest of the image to load...
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2009 Aug 7 at 21:52 UTC
— Ed. 2009 Aug 7 at 21:52 UTC
|
|
|
|
This just in: it is OK to beat anyone with a prime number IQ.
Rihanna's IQ=117 so the answer is NO. You can not beat Rihanna.
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2009 Aug 8 at 02:25 UTC
|
|
|
SRAW
Rocket Man
2007 Nov 6 • 2525
601 ₧
|
actually her iq must be lower than that, internet iq tests are usually completely wrong
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2009 Aug 8 at 05:16 UTC
|
|
|
|
SRAW said: actually her iq must be lower than that, internet iq tests are usually completely wrong
That's true, according to them I have an IQ of somewhere between 85 and 176.
...and that's the bottom line because Mate de Vita said so.
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2009 Aug 8 at 08:59 UTC
|
|
|
Down Rodeo
Cap'n Moth of the Firehouse
2007 Oct 19 • 5486
57,583 ₧
|
I don't put much stock in IQ tests in general. The idea that any one aspect of a person can be summed up as a number is a little silly to me.
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2009 Aug 8 at 12:10 UTC
|
|
|
|
|
|
Who are we talking about again? 
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2009 Aug 8 at 15:37 UTC
|
|
|
|
wow she has a better iq than me...120
I drink to forget but I always remember.
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2009 Aug 9 at 07:07 UTC
|
|
|
|
Down Rodeo said: I don't put much stock in IQ tests in general. The idea that any one aspect of a person can be summed up as a number is a little silly to me.
Because age and wealth certainly aren't real.
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2009 Aug 9 at 21:26 UTC
|
|
|
Down Rodeo
Cap'n Moth of the Firehouse
2007 Oct 19 • 5486
57,583 ₧
|
The current banking crisis has caused many rants on my part, arguing that it's all bullshit. It's imaginary. Wealth is not real, it's not tangible. And age is an abstract representation of how many rotations one relatively small rock has gone around a medium-sized star in an unfashionable end of the galaxy while you live. Unless you count your age in seconds. I'll give you that.
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2009 Aug 10 at 10:36 UTC
|
|
|
aaronjer
*****'n Admin
2005 Mar 21 • 5105
1,227 ₧
|
Are you saying that seconds are inherently less arbitrary than years?
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2009 Aug 10 at 13:00 UTC
— Ed. 2009 Aug 10 at 13:00 UTC
|
|
|
Down Rodeo
Cap'n Moth of the Firehouse
2007 Oct 19 • 5486
57,583 ₧
|
Yes. Slightly. But I did say "I'll give you that".
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2009 Aug 13 at 22:42 UTC
|
|
|
|
Page [1]
|
