|
Rockbomb said: One thing I just noticed, is that if you go to a page with a really long name, it makes the tab take up like half of the browser width. So whenever you get to makin the tabs (usin the image I made + puttin the close tab/new tab buttons with the tabs), you hsould make it a fixed tab size.
I will do that.
I jus' realised that I am using Opera and Firefox, when I have my own web browser. What better way to test it than to actually use it?
WhiteBird Official Release
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2010 Feb 1 at 22:02 UTC
— Ed. 2010 Feb 2 at 10:23 UTC
|
|
|
|
im gona doo it then
edit: hahahahh this butten doesint do aneything yet 
ps: this seams relley handey now that i think about it when i had opera on my labtop everey thing was all scrunched up and if i have that on then...well it seams handey kinda :D!!
I drink to forget but I always remember.
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2010 Feb 3 at 01:07 UTC
— Ed. 2010 Feb 3 at 01:30 UTC
|
|
|
|
so any progress ? Im actually planning on using this!
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2010 Feb 11 at 21:01 UTC
|
|
|
Rockbomb
Dog fucker (but in a good way now)
2009 Nov 14 • 2045
|
Last I heard (which was last night), sprinkles was gonna completely start over, so he could give more structure/sensibility so the code.
@Sprinkles - Are you gonna release a beta of that html editor?
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2010 Feb 11 at 21:17 UTC
|
|
|
|
Yes, I am going to release the HTML Editor. However, it isn't that complex of an application (i.e. not many things can go wrong other than an IO exception), so I think a beta version is a waste of time.
Also, I am working on WhiteBird from scratch so I don't have time to work on the HTML Editor.
Furthermore, since I am structuring my code better I don't think it is necessary to create a stand-alone HTML Editor (though I may in the future -after WhiteBird's completion).
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2010 Feb 11 at 21:42 UTC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2010 Feb 12 at 08:26 UTC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2010 Feb 12 at 13:29 UTC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2010 Feb 13 at 21:47 UTC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2010 Feb 15 at 00:23 UTC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2010 Feb 16 at 10:16 UTC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2010 Mar 2 at 20:36 UTC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2010 Mar 15 at 00:50 UTC
|
|
|
buq25
2008 Jul 5 • 583
295 ₧
|
Sprinkles, Youtube bullies WhiteBird  .
"Your browser is no longer supported.
Please upgrade to a modern browser."
"No longer"?  I find that interesting.
Today's post brought to you by the letter: "heck".
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2010 Mar 15 at 14:59 UTC
|
|
|
|
buq25 said: Sprinkles, Youtube bullies WhiteBird .
"Your browser is no longer supported.
Please upgrade to a modern browser."
"No longer"? I find that interesting. Could be that youtube jus 'upgraded' their site.
Thanks for the information.
But since WhiteBird is based off the System.Windows.Forms.WebBrowser class which is, essentially, IE 6; I can see why that would happen.
I'll look into it.
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2010 Mar 15 at 15:28 UTC
— Ed. 2010 Mar 15 at 15:28 UTC
|
|
|
Down Rodeo
Cap'n Moth of the Firehouse
2007 Oct 19 • 5486
57,583 ₧
|
sprinkles said: WhiteBird is based off ... essentially, IE 6
ARGH OH GOD
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2010 Mar 15 at 15:54 UTC
|
|
|
|
Don't panic!
After college (um 3-6 years maybe) I will be 'pro' enough to make my own Web Browser class and everything will be better than Humpty Dumpty.
Don't you jus' love waiting?
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2010 Mar 15 at 15:59 UTC
|
|
|
Down Rodeo
Cap'n Moth of the Firehouse
2007 Oct 19 • 5486
57,583 ₧
|
Absolutely. OTOH you could use something like Webkit or Gecko at the moment, if you felt like it. Steam's moved to Webkit :)
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2010 Mar 15 at 16:48 UTC
|
|
|
|
Panic!
You expect me to use my competitors work?
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2010 Mar 15 at 17:51 UTC
|
|
|
|
sprinkles said: You expect me to use my competitors work?
Isn't that what most people do?
...and that's the bottom line because Mate de Vita said so.
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2010 Mar 15 at 18:33 UTC
|
|
|
Down Rodeo
Cap'n Moth of the Firehouse
2007 Oct 19 • 5486
57,583 ₧
|
Well, in some sense you already are, no? Because if you are using IE 6 as your base renderer then surely you'd have no qualms about swapping it out for something, well, better. Frankly. Internet Explorer is a very poorly-written piece of sh- software.
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2010 Mar 15 at 18:34 UTC
|
|
|
|
Down Rodeo said: Well, in some sense you already are, no? Because if you are using IE 6 as your base renderer then surely you'd have no qualms about swapping it out for something, well, better. Frankly. Internet Explorer is a very poorly-written piece of sh- software.
I don't consider using the web browser class (that is IE 6) as my 'competitors' work. This is simply because I am promoting the Windows OS. I am using things only compatible with Windows (Windows 7 API, .Net Framework).
Although I do plan to use Chrome's V8 javascript engine.
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2010 Mar 15 at 19:01 UTC
— Ed. 2010 Mar 15 at 19:03 UTC
|
|
|
|
Guess what it is.
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2010 May 23 at 01:47 UTC
|
|
|
|
...thats...smart?
gess what the 3ed box on the top is????
I drink to forget but I always remember.
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2010 May 23 at 01:57 UTC
— Ed. 2010 May 23 at 01:59 UTC
|
|
|
|
To answer cloud's question, yes that is a lot like the speed dial in Chrome and Opera; but its even better.
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2010 May 23 at 02:06 UTC
|
|
|
SRAW
Rocket Man
2007 Nov 6 • 2525
601 ₧
|
What's the point of making your own browser if there are better ones around?
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2010 May 23 at 11:13 UTC
|
|
|
|
