|
Down Rodeo said: You should use regular expressions!
Which, interestingly enough, are no longer considered regular! That is, their complexity is greater than than a regular language, they're now something like a context-free.
What do you mean?
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2009 Dec 16 at 21:42 UTC
|
|
|
Down Rodeo
Cap'n Moth of the Firehouse
2007 Oct 19 • 5486
57,583 ₧
|
What do you mean, what do I mean?
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2009 Dec 17 at 01:43 UTC
|
|
|
|
Down Rodeo said: What do you mean, what do I mean?
What the hell is a regular expression?
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2009 Dec 17 at 03:01 UTC
|
|
|
Down Rodeo
Cap'n Moth of the Firehouse
2007 Oct 19 • 5486
57,583 ₧
|
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2009 Dec 17 at 12:13 UTC
|
|
|
|
I didn't know wikipedia was a regular expression.
...and that's the bottom line because Mate de Vita said so.
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2009 Dec 17 at 12:56 UTC
|
|
|
|
You know what I use Wikipedia for? I use it for album art the Itunes refuses to download [or leftload for that matter]. Other than that I wouldn't use Wikipedia to wipe my ass. 
Come on DR the first site I clicked on was dedicated to regular expressions, use Wikipedia please. Oh wait you wouldn't have gotten the same results since you use Google. 
Regular Expressions
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2009 Dec 17 at 14:10 UTC
— Ed. 2009 Dec 17 at 14:15 UTC
|
|
|
|
The Wikipedia regular expression:
regex code /citation\s+needed/i |
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2009 Dec 17 at 19:59 UTC
— Ed. 2009 Dec 17 at 20:01 UTC
|
|
|
Down Rodeo
Cap'n Moth of the Firehouse
2007 Oct 19 • 5486
57,583 ₧
|
Actually if I type "regex" into the firefox address bar I imagine I'd get there, seeing as I've been there before.
Testing reveals yes, I did! It's a good reference for how to make them but probably Wikipedia tells you what they are more clearly. Also, about the second bit... Wiki is probably the best bet for that too, as I don't know of any one site offhand that will give you a fairly simple introduction to the Chomsky Hierarchy.
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2009 Dec 17 at 20:13 UTC
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I skimmed over it, and said "Ahh, I'll ne'er need to know this." Which I probably will, but we'll worry about that later.
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2009 Dec 17 at 22:56 UTC
|
|
|
|
oh i also got my question answer from this topic thanks for all who share theiir ideas
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2010 Jan 31 at 18:25 UTC
|
|
|
|
Down Rodeo said: You should use regular expressions!
Regular expressions are shit. 
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2010 Jan 31 at 23:02 UTC
|
|
|
Down Rodeo
Cap'n Moth of the Firehouse
2007 Oct 19 • 5486
57,583 ₧
|
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2010 Feb 1 at 01:23 UTC
|
|
|
|
They make no sense, sure they may make things easier; but, nonetheless, their senseless. 
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2010 Feb 1 at 01:52 UTC
— Ed. 2010 Feb 1 at 01:52 UTC
|
|
|
|
sprinkles said: Regular expressions are the shit.  I agree!
The guy who made regular-expressions.info has been published by o'Reilly, I'll believe anything he says!
In what way are they senseless? They may be hard to read until you learn the very basic syntax, but they are incredibly logical. FORMULAIC, even...
|
|
|
|
|
≡
|
2010 Apr 15 at 19:37 UTC
|
|
|
|
