This site is part of the superjer.com network

Buffy Reviews & Media by Mikejer
home
reviews
podcast
articles
links
discussion


SEASON 1 REVIEW

A review by Mikelangelo "MikeJer" Marinaro


Quick Links

Overview

After just finishing all twelve season one episodes and looking back on my reviews, I've pretty much come to the conclusion that while this season is certainly flawed, it's still pretty entertaining. Also Buffy is cute, quirky, and at times very sexy (just thought I'd throw that in, heh). The episode scores vary wildly and that just goes to show that the writers were searching to strike the right balance. While I am pleased that the cliché topics were hit upon early and then pretty much dropped in subsequent seasons, it doesn't help save this season for mediocre plotting. I suppose part of my evaluation comes from my experiences in showing friends this show from the beginning. Most people can see that there is a lot of good underneath the often corny exterior and poor special effects. Unfortunately, some cannot. I'm frankly very surprised that the show got picked up for a second season. While I whole-heartedly believe that the show deserved to be picked up (because the dialog and the character development were still spot on), I'm surprised the network executives saw the potential as well.

What I really want to talk about is the character interaction; it is simply fantastic. The dialog is sparking all over the place and the characters grow on you so fast and heavily that you feel like you've known them your entire life. That's very difficult to do and I don't recall that ever happening before in any other shows I've watched. All the characters are witty and intelligent (though with varying degrees of both) and when the main characters are talking to each other you feel like you're right there with them. The dialog is obviously an integral part of why the characters have this snappy wit. Aside from a few clunky lines in the first group of episodes, the show had a remarkably refreshing method of speech. I've never seen a show before or since (with the exception of Whedon's own Firefly) that had such an intrinsic and unique speech pattern.


Buffy

Another thing that separates this show from the masses is character growth. In only twelve episodes the characters grew and evolved more than some shows do in the entire course of the series. Let's start with Buffy Summers. She arrives in Sunnydale trying to escape her past. She felt she'd done the Slayer 'thing' and was ready to move on and go back to a normal life. Of course life on the hellmouth isn't going to help that wish in the slightest. By the end of the season she's went from running away from her destiny, to accepting it in a light, fun way, to briefly trying to run away from it again (Prophecy Girl [1x12]) and then coming back to it in a serious, accepting way. Oh yeah, then she dies for that acceptance. How many other shows can say that of their main character after the first season? None others that I know of, that's for sure. All of this development sets her character up for the big season ahead. When S2 begins her character is right where she left off, not forgetting everything that happened. She's not the same person she was in the first episode.


Willow

I could go on some more about how much depth and development the main character got, but what's almost even more impressive is the amount of depth and development all the other characters got. Willow goes from being a shy computer nerd to a slightly less shy computer nerd. We learn about a lot of her fears in Nightmares (1x10) and she even stands up and fights in Prophecy Girl (1x12). Before the show started she would have been screaming and running away in a fevered panic in the same situations. While I admit her computer skills are ridiculously convenient for plot purposes and also completely unrealistic, her ultra cute mannerisms and dialog more than make up for it.


Xander

Xander also had quite a bit of development. He got a crush on Buffy right from the start and developed a jealousy problem every time a guy started to get close to her. It's really good to see this problem didn't go away over the course of the season, but only get worse. After Buffy reveals to the group that Angel is a vampire in Angel (1x07), Xander is the first one to jump up at the thought of killing him. Xander's jealousy is a massive flaw in his character that defines many of his actions in future seasons (the famous "kick his ass" [2x22] line being a prime example). All of what's to come from him began right here, in these beginning episodes.


Giles

Giles, who begins the show as the staple British guy, who's only there for stuffy exposition scenes in Welcome to the Hellmouth (1x01), gets a surprising amount of development himself (though we see a lot more as the series progresses). Instead of staying a caricature Giles develops a paternal bond with Buffy by season's end. He genuinely cares about her well-being, and not just from the standpoint of being her Watcher. This is clearly displayed in Prophecy Girl (1x12) when he is willing to defy prophecy to spare Buffy her destined death. He also has some spark with the new Computer Science teacher, Jenny Calendar. They fight and argue over books vs. computers but Ms. Calendar is shown to have obvious affections for him from the get-go, and it's almost obvious that Giles gets some satisfaction from their debates.


Cordelia

Next is Cordelia, who has undergone tremendous change. Admittedly this change really began in Out of Mind, Out of Sight (1x11) when Buffy saved her face from being disfigured by the invisible girl. In this episode we see a whole new side to Cordelia. She confesses to Buffy that even though she's incredibly popular it doesn't mean she never feels alone. In Prophecy Girl (1x12) we see her talking with the group more and willing to hang out around them when none of her friends are watching. This development is not forgotten and is also picked up right where it left off in S2.


Angel

Then there's Angel, the vampire with a soul. It's amusing to me that I like his S1 character more, now that I know his history, than I did when I watched it for the first time. Knowing what I know, Angel's love interest and actions with Buffy are perfectly understandable and believable. Once his vampire heritage is revealed, the Buffy and Angel relationship really commences and already has a solid foundation below it.


The Master

While I'm talking about characters, I might as well mention the big villain for the season. The Master is what I consider to be an 'OK' villain. He had some great moments, but overall I found him to be pretty lackluster and at times far too corny. Also, his makeup is really inconsistent. In some episodes he looks terrifying while in most he looks goofy. I suppose as a first half-season villain he served his purpose. I think if he'd been written consistently less corny and also had a lot more screen time he could have been a better villain, but that's all speculation. I liked his character considerably more in Prophecy Girl (1x12) though.


Conclusion

Overall I must say I'm extremely pleased with the first season. It's not all delicious but when you look back at the season from a character development perspective it's impossible to deny the depth to which all the characters possess after so few episodes. Also worth mentioning is the hefty serving of foreshadowing in most of the episodes. Some of the foreshadowing was hinting at events and actions to come later in the season, but a few began to plant the seeds that would flourish in future seasons. On the negative side, the slow "creepy" scenes only work half of the time and get old quickly. Those are wisely dispatched in S2. Also, there are way too many people that just appear for one episode. This is once again done away with in S2. My only other complaint is the music; it is terrible. The reason why it is terrible is because it's trying to be corny and B-movie like which is ultimately not what 'Buffy' is about. I am incredibly pleased to state that Mutant Enemy (the company behind 'Buffy') got a new composer, Christopher Beck, for the show's second season. This marks a gigantic improvement in quality in the music and sound department. Every single complaint I have with this season is rectified in S2. This is the worst and my least favorite season of 'Buffy,' though it still has a ton of merrit. You can tell Mutant Enemy knew what they were doing and got on track for what would be a successful seven year run.


Season Breakdown
  • P (100): None
  • A (90-99): 2 episodes
  • B (75-89): 4 episodes
  • C (60-74): 3 episodes
  • D (45-59): 1 episode
  • F (0-44): 2 episodes

Average Episode Score
65 /100
C
A season with many problematic episodes. Although many of them struggle, there are a few standouts that show what the series is capable of.

Season Score
72 /100
C+
As a whole, the season has several moments of solid entertainment, but many aspects are severely lacking. There is a ton of room for growth and/or improvement. Not poor, just mediocre.

Awards

Screencaps


Comments (16)

1.AaronJer  Sep 14 2006
The only thing I really liked about Season 1 is the sharp contrast it has to the later seasons. It's all like, "Oh no! Vampires! *stab*", as compared to horrific emotional trauma later on. It makes the later seasons hit harder when you can remember that things used to be so fluffy and nice.

2.Dingdong(alistic)  Sep 24 2006
I wouldn't say it's as cut and dried as that. Season one is the lightest season, but the emotional trauma doesn't dominate either season three or four either.

3.21  Apr 21 2007
Unless you consider things from Faith's point of view.

4.LibMax  Jul 14 2007
I think Season One was the weakest season of Buffy. There's plenty of good stuff, flashes of the brilliance that would characterize most of the rest of the series (with a few sputters in Season Two and significant sagging in Season Seven). But the performances, the dialog, and the directing are very hit-and-miss, with little apparent quality control. Most of the episode plots are inane and formulaic - introduce the monster, figure out how Buffy can kill the monster, oops it's dead.

The effects are mostly awful, and the cheese factor is high in many episodes, especially "The Puppet Show." The Master was the weakest of all the Big Bads, fun only when he got out of his hole in the ground (mostly in "Nightmares") or when he was making fun of how boring he usually was ("Oh, wait, that isn't written anywhere."). Check him out in "The Wish" to see how much better the actor and the character can be once they drop the bell-book-and-candle stuff and give him a real point of view. And I guess I'll be the first to mention the worst recurring character/performance ever, The Annointed One.

Everything that's good in Season One is stuff that got better in the subsequent seasons. The basic characters and character relationships are wonderful, and the character development was probably the single best feature of the season. That and the fact that, even in a supernatural genre with some pretty silly plotlines, actions always had consequences for the characters.

5.Dingdongalistic  Jul 24 2007

- QUOTE -
with a few sputters in Season Two and significant sagging in Season Seven

And virtually all of season three.


6.buffyholic  Jul 25 2007
I agree. Although I like S1 very much, it´s very weak, the weakest of Buffy. The thing that surprises the most is the character development. When we get to the later seasons, we stand in awe thinking that the characters came from S1, all happy and not so concerned with all the things they would experience later on. When we see the entire series, we even watch to see S1 as a reminder of those happy days.

7.entEngle  Nov 9 2007
I'm loaning my Buffy dvds to a friend who's interest
was spawned by Serenity & Firefly. He's aware of my
obsession, and knows my emotions are invested in the
anticipated sharing of all 144. That said, I spend
much time at trying to find better introductions to
Buffy than seas.1. At best, I feel it is like that
deep relaxing breath, BEFORE something truly great.
Since my friend WANTS to watch 1st things 1st, I'm
conceding reluctantly and surrendering 1,2&3 of 39.

8.Andrew  Dec 29 2007
Hm.
The Master is frankly rubbish- I think you under-state the case there. I would agree that the only time he comes across as even vaguely interesting is in Nightmares. The Annointed One is worse, if anything. Creepy small children can be very effective if done well; unfortunately this is a ptime example of the opposite.
As regards the over-arching plot of the series, I don't think series one has anything really to recommend it at all. It's saved from total awfulness by a small number of excellent self-contained episodes (Nightmares, Witch and The Pack, in that order, in my opinion, though a few others are also watchable).

9.Nix  Jan 11 2008
What's worst about the Anointed One is that *nothing is done with him*. He's a gun on the mantelpiece introduced with great portentuousness --- and what's the sum total of his actions? To lead Buffy down into the Master's cave. Any random vamp could do that, not that they needed to because Buffy knew where it was anyway and was going there herself at the time.

10.lee  May 4 2008
i did like season one but you cant really compare it to the rest, its never gonna be better than the rest. its just too short, and they had to stick to the basics really and introduce the show. Thats it, it was like an intro to buffy proper. there is a few little gems in there too, like harvest and the pack.

11.Jaden  May 17 2008
the sad thing about this season is that it is actually unnecisary to the series (which is something that no show should be able to say about its first season). as mike has been doing for his friends, it would be the same (most likely better) to start straight off from season 2 without dragging through season 1 which has a very slow pace and will most likely turn people off the series before it even starts! i mean the other seasons did a great job fleshing out what would otherwise be one-dimensional characters, something that other shows never fully achieve. however one thing that i have to say is great is that since the series starts off bad it can almost certainly be guaranteed to get better. i mean look at shows like prisonbreak and alias and then look at shows like friends and 24. the former shows had excellent first seasons but were left with nothing but decline whearas the latter had mediocre beginings but got better and better with each season.

12.DarknessLostprophets  May 28 2008
I must say i partially disagree with your season one review of buffy the vampire slayer, obviously overall compared to the other seasons, most revelant in this case season two three five and seven, which in my opinion are the better seasons, season six being intresting for other reasons, i.e character development, and season four being utter nonsense, minus faith and angel's return and restless and primevil, highlights of the entire 22 episode season, anyway back to my original point. I believe that season one is simply 'starting out', its the baby steps in the coming to adult part of ones life, its like the first day of starting a new school, you meet new people who will be important in your life and you struggle with your future and the person you are now, in buffy's case, the slayer and the girl buffy. Certain episodes, i believe are pivotol in creating the buffylore, which becomes the basis of the entire buffyverse, episodes like welcome to the hellmouth, the harvest, angel and prophecy girl, in particular are my favourites as it chronicled the first year of what it meant to be the sunnydale slayer, maybe not superbly but it touched upon it. However i must admit, it is mainly buffy, and only buffy alone that develops as a character, notbly cordelia [shows hints of insight in out of sight, out of mind]and willow also. The master, i must admit is an adequate villian, i think that was the point, he was 'the vampire' foe of sunnydale, and the whole being stuck underground is to not only stretch the season to twelve episodes, but to also explore different supernatural elements in the buffyverse, i.e. witches demons etc. and also to allow the entire budget to stretch as its obvious that the makers were aware that this could be a one season show, thats why the purposefully round of everything in prophecy girl, but im extremley glad buffy continued for another six year. Overall, i think season one isn't perfect, but its crediable to welcoming people to the buffy world as its more apporachable, could this be said for season 6, no, because you need to have follow the characters from seasons one to five to comprehend and enjoy season 6. Buffy started out ok and went on to become the best show on television

13.Nix  May 28 2008
DarknessLostprophets, you didn't like Hush or Something Blue? Passing strange... Season four has a crappy plotline but it has some excellent individual episodes (counterbalanced somewhat by a couple of truly awful ones).

Oh, it's not the first year, either: in internal chronology it's half a year long.

And you don't have to start at the beginning. I started out in the Buffyverse with season 5, and while I lost some fascinating linkups (the Restless / Dracula connections) and the Dawn introduction obviously wasn't exactly shocking (look! a new character! ... everyone's a new character) it *did* work. And I say that as a completist who promptly watched everything from s1 on, in order :)

14.DarknesLostprophets  May 28 2008
oh i throughly enjoyed hush i miss that out, forgive me for that, that was one of the best episodes for buffy, as it was totally different from anything previously done in the show. Something blue on the other hand humoured me but not to the extent that i would call it an memorable episode, its only popular due to the whole spike and buffy thing, dont get me started on the crapness of spike in the later buffy years as that will be a rant that will last 10 years! :P I do love spike dearly but i felt in the end of season 6 and throughout season 7, he was a weak loser, with him being depicted as the next angel, the whole vampire with a soul thing, he completely lost his edge of which made him so entertaining and addictive

On the note of the watching buffy from the beginning, didn't you at all feel obilivous to particular references of the past of which you never knew of, due the fact of not watching previous seasons? buffy is like a movie, and season 5 for me is like the second to end section of the movie, but thats just my opinion

15.Shular  Jul 31 2008
Can't believe I only just now found this site. Anyway, I really enjoyed your reviews of the first season and, if you haven't already done so, I urge you not to change your initial reviews. Unless I'm misunderstanding the context, your initial reviews were written after watching the episodes for the first time, and I think it's important to retain that initial response. Sure, it's interesting to re-evaluate episodes after watching the rest of the season, but that doesn't invalidate your first reaction.

Anyway, time to read Season 2.

16.mikejer  Jul 31 2008
Shular: thanks for your comment! However, I had already watched the series several times before I started reviewing the first season. I want to re-write these reviews because I don't feel their quality comes anywhere close to the level I matured into when I realized what I really wanted to do with this site. In short: I have a fair amount more to say about S1 now than I did then, and I want that recorded here on the site. I might try to think of a way to still write new reviews but keep these old ones stored and available for prosperity. Thanks again though! :)


Post a Comment
Name


(copy your comment in case of failure!)

Security Code
Security Code


Copyright © 2000-2008 SuperJer.com. All rights reserved.