SuperJer.com
SuperJer.com
SuperJer.com
LIGHT  |  DARK
news videos cs maps articles software music forum
home
reviews
articles
links
discussion


1x17 – ETERNITY


Writer(s): Tracey Stern
Director: Regis Kimble

Pros/Cons | Foreshadowing | Quotes | Score | Comments

(Writing Credits explained here!)

Angelus, one could argue, is the single most powerful force in the fictional universe of both “Buffy the Vampire Slayer” and “Angel: the Series.” Most fans could only argue for a force equal in power. For “Buffy,” Angelus defined her character; having to kill her one true love to save the world was not only heartbreaking for Buffy (and for us, the viewers), it changed her fundamentally. The ramifications of BtVS [2x22] “Becoming, Part II,” made her the Slayer; by having to deal with the very most difficult of choices at the highest stakes for the first time, Buffy was no longer a young girl who happened to be a Slayer. She was now a Slayer who also happened to be a young girl, and as the years went by with dangers becoming greater, this only intensified.

All her most difficult experiences, including alienation from her friends as a result of this calling, relationship anxieties with every man she touched, superiority complexes (and the inferiority complexes within them) and a great deal of other issues, can all be traced back in one way or another to her doomed love with Angel, the demon it brought forth and what she had to sacrifice to destroy it.

And if Buffy spent her life in the shadow of that demon, Angel spent his life with it on his shoulders. During both time periods of Angelus’ existence (1753-1898 and 1998), his demonic shadow, a personality that lived to defy the artless, drunken slacker he was in his human life, committed sins too many to count with deviations too horrifying and pre-meditated to name. His drunken, artless life having unwittingly led him to become a vampire, the ensouled Angel’s entire existence was one of a quest for redemption to pay for the crimes of his alter-ego. And the close proximity of Angelus, always within his mind and not too far from the surface, was a constant reminder why saving souls and connecting to them was of the utmost importance: It was all that could deliver him his soul.

(Aside from many other reasons, this is the major flaw of the Angelus arc in S4, as the demon is treated as a completely different entity within the same body as Angel, thereby violating canon and nullifying one of the most interesting and vital pieces to the necessity of Angel’s quest for redemption.)

And so “Eternity” is an interesting and unique little piece, I think. By all accounts, as a critic, I should hate it. Angelus is nothing if not a force to be reckoned with, and this goes for any writer attempting to tackle him as well. I always smile in glee when re-watching BtVS [2x14] “Innocence,” visualizing Joss Whedon going mad at the keyboard with those joyously evil entendre’s, but Angelus’ importance as a figure in the Buffy/Angelverse is so crucial that his invocation must be done with great care and purpose. This is why, as a critic, I should really hate this episode. He’s used as little more than a device (even if effectively), and yet some solid writing and screwball timing keep this episode on my good side; it was definitely a surprise hit.

The plot concerns Rebecca, a young and down-on-her-luck actress who is struggling to find a niche a season and a half after the end of her cult TV show (this carries some humour for me reviewing this show after its end). When Angel saves her life by pushing her out of the way of a car, she takes an interest in him, eventually discovering he’s a vampire. This intrigues rather than frightens her, leading her to try and seduce him via the Hollywood method – with a drug – which then leads him to become Angelus. See what I meant?

There’s a moral to the story this week too, and this time it’s honesty. The episode opens with Angel and Wesley panicking, trying to escape, and we find out they’re watching Cordelia at a play. Both are patronizing her later, omitting certain facts; not exactly saying they liked it (the play) or didn’t like it as to not hurt feelings, but in fact lying in the process. And in fact, everyone is lying to each other; Oliver, Rebecca’s agent, lies to her about the attacks and her chances of getting a new role. Angel lies to Rebecca about taking her case and to his friends about his criticisms of them. Rebecca lies to Angel and Cordelia as well, but for different reasons and much worse results.

The worth of the episode comes from how the characters deal in and react to these lies, and how it characterizes them more personally. Angel is omitting truths and in some cases outright lying, however it is often out of his sense of justice. Deciding what’s best for others and how to deal with it has always been a part of his character concerning those he cares about, and so his lies to Wesley, Cordelia and Rebecca were well-intentioned; what he believed was better for their protection and/or happiness.

Rebecca is the counterpoint, lying out of a care only for herself, which is all her existence is concerned with. Unable to see the small amount of love she actually has (coming from her agent Oliver, who wants so desperately to help her that he’s willing to terrorize her), she’s as trapped in her character Raven – a forever young, popular, season-limited woman – as her fans are. That she despises them for this trait is an interesting commentary on how she views herself. And yet she clearly envies them to a point, as desperate to forever be Raven as much as her fans want her to be, and it’s for these motives that Rebecca takes an interest in Angel.

She lies to him, manipulates Cordelia into giving information on his life and his Gypsie curse under the guise of friendship, and drugs his drink with a “happy pill” based on this information, betraying him in the most underhanded of ways. The intentions of these lies are what differentiate her from Angel (selfish as opposed to selfless), and yet the writers are careful enough to make us sympathize with her, the sad and slow deterioration of her life gently revealed throughout the episode. Her motivations are never in question and even in her worst moments she invokes that sympathy, which I though was a smart move. Angel expertly sums it all up mid-transformation: “You think you want to stay the same? What you really want is to make it disappear.”

All the pain, deceit and worries of fading away become too much for her, and a life spent so long in service of only one-self drove Rebecca to this end. And what an end it was. David Boreanaz once again was a delight as Angelus and with a few good lines to back up him up too (still not as masterfully written as Whedon’s invocation, however). It was the scene the episode was built for, because Angelus is, if anything, brutally honest. In an evil way of course; Cordelia herself says of Angelus in 4x11: Soulless that he “lies with the truth,” which is true. Angelus’ presence here is to bring out the truth in everyone, as he cruelly recants Angel’s insecurities over his friends’ shortcomings, and terrifies Rebecca with every mannerism and gesture.

Their reactions to the ‘truth of the demon’ are the second important part of the show. Cordelia is stalwart and accepting, as is Wesley as well as brave. The truth is not always the most pleasant thing to hear, but what makes them good people and good friends is that they can take it, both of them adamant in their chastising of Angel, telling him that he needs to be just as honest as the “evil” version of himself. Angel learns this lesson well. Though, I doubt he’s ever so cruel. As for Rebecca, the experience simply overwhelms; the truth wounds her, and she is scared off to never come back. Whether this will improve her personality in the long run or not is left up in the air, but I believe such an alarming dump of cold honesty may have awakened some better part of her, and the difference of it to her false life was a giant shock to handle.

Now as I mentioned earlier, it didn’t sit right with me how Angelus was brought about. I didn’t hate the episode, but the idea that a simple drug, a man-made synthetic chemical could have the same effect as true love, and remove something as important as a soul, is downright insulting. It’s where the episode gets all of its demerits. Maybe it was just a poor understanding of the mythology and frankly, I kind of like to believe that despite the lessons learned here, this thing sort of never happened. Cheap is the value of a soul if a simple drug can remove it, and it also leads me to wonder: If it’s that easy, why did Wolfram and Hart never consider a more powerful version of the drug to turn Angel to their ‘side’, as was their plan for him from this season on?

It’s a shame that the writers couldn’t conceive something better to make Angel lose his soul, or a better plot that wouldn’t have to bring him to that anyway. As much as I enjoy Angelus in every frame, even in the deeply flawed arc of S4, the carelessness of it was just shameful. Maybe Rebecca could’ve learned about Buffy from talking with Cordelia, and slipped Angel a drug that would’ve made him believe he was with her? Would’ve sat better with me than what's here.

Still, there’s value here and this episode is not be totally discounted. If Somnambulist wasn’t enough of a reminder to the characters of the danger of Angelus, always lurking beneath the surface, this certainly did the trick.

Other Pros/Cons (+/-)
  
+  Cordelia’s line about the ‘idiot network.’ As Whedon fans, how many times have we heard this?
+  Oliver’s second appearance. I love the use of continuity in this show!
+  Rebecca’s sultry curiousity and embrace of the notion of vampires.
+  Cordelia’s giggling.
+  Angelus’ brief, but fun, rampage.
-  The entire idea of the happy pill. Insulting.
  
Foreshadowing
  • Wesley tells Cordelia that the chances of Angel finding true happiness with an actress are slim. Though Angel does fall in love with Cordelia in S3, she is still never like Buffy to him, and we see in 4x10: Awakening when he says Buffy’s name in bed rather than Cordelia’s, that Wesley’s comment is, in some odd way, true.

Quotes

CORDELIA:   Okay, so I was loud. But was I any good?
WESLEY:   You – took the role and made it your own.
CORDELIA:   Really? Thanks. Angel, was I good?
ANGEL:   I wouldn’t say it if I didn’t think so.
CORDELIA:   Thanks – You didn’t say it.”

ANGEL:   I’m not what you think.
REBECCA:   You’re not? Because – no reflection - dark, private office, instantly knowing those letters weren’t written in blood, I guess what I would think is - vampire.
ANGEL:   Then again...
REBECCA:   Which is impossible. Bela Lugosi, Gary Oldman, they’re vampires.
ANGEL:   Frank Langella was the only performance I believed but…

WESLEY:   Angel’s moment of true happiness occurred because he was with Buffy. You realize how rare that is – true happiness? And what are the odds he’s find that with an actress.
CORDELIA:   What’s that supposed to mean?
WESLEY:   I was – I meant TV-actress

REBECCA:   I wasn’t afraid, was I? When I looked into the mirror and you weren’t there I didn’t scream. I didn’t run. I understood.
ANGEL:   No. You weren’t afraid. You looked into that mirror and all you saw was yourself. That’s all you ever see, Rebecca, and that’s what really frightens you. This isn’t about the way the studio, the network, or the fans see you. It’s about how you see yourself. Your own reflection has been corrupted into something unrecognizable. You think you want to stay the same? What you really want is to make it disappear.

ANGELUS:   Remind me to get the name of your dealer before I kill you.
REBECCA:   (terrified) Kill me?
ANGELUS:   In all my years, I’ve never killed a famous person before. But with no witnesses – who’s gonna believe me? Maybe we can take a picture. - I know! We do it like we did back in the day. I’ll keep your head on a stick – as proof!

CORDELIA:   Angelus may not be the most relaxing company, but at least he’s honest. Shouldn’t I expect the same from the not-evil version of my friends?
ANGEL:   So we’re okay then?
CORDELIA:   I’m too big of a person to let something so petty get in the way of our friendship.
ANGEL:   I appreciate that. (long silence) You’re not going to untie me, are you?
CORDELIA:   (walks away) Pfft!
Awards:
Surprise Hit in S1


Score:   B
80 /100







Comments (20)

1. In the review, Ryan asked the question why W & H never tried to give Angel a super and permanent version of the happy drug to make him lose his soul. I've heard the same question regarding them using a similar demon to the one in BtVS 3x17 Enemies to remove his soul. The Shanshu prophecy requires a vampire champion with a soul. W & H want said champion on their side for the apocolypse. If Angel is Angelus, even if they could recruit him, no longer qualifies for the prophecy.

posted by: Dafydd, May 23 2006


2. It's an intriguing theory, but I'm not sure whether I completely agree. For one, we don't know how much W & H actually know about the prophecy at the time, or whether they even have it, because in "Five by Five", they simply want Angel dead, which would seem to imply they weren't thinking long-term with Angel yet. Secondly, W & H seem throughout the S2 arc to be attempting to bring Angel out of the game by turning him dark, distracting him from his real path, but not winning him over to their side. It seemed to be more of an attempt to weaken the forces against them rather than win them over.

Personally, I felt the drug at the end of "Eternity" was merely a rather lazy plot device to have Angelus "Back" without any long-term effects. To be honest I don't think "Eternity" was meant to have any long-term bearing.

posted by: Dingdong, May 23 2006


3. I agree that Eternity was definately structured around not bringing him back but instead just being a one-off and that's why I really dislike the episode. It messes with a lot of stuff just for a cheap thrill and I didn't think it was neccessary.

However the prophecy clearly states that "The vampire with a soul will play an important role in the apocalypse" and turning him into Angelus would obviously make him useless.

It wasn't W&H trying to kill him in Five by Five it was a few lawyers working outside the system.

And of course it all comes down to the most important aspect...the story.

posted by: Fallen, May 23 2006


4. As I understand it, they had to make clear to new people who hadn't watched BtVS before (especially s.2) that angel without a soul wasn't good company.

because that's the story's premise: a evil guy turned good seeking redemption; but the important thing is to make clear, that he's not just quite a bad guy, but something really, really to be scared of (which they destroyed by AtS. S.4), that you shouldn't mess with that, also in terms of, why he really shouldn't have a girlfriend, and how fine the line is, he walks.

For me that's one of the first AtS-eps, that worked (next to Rmwav), but tastes are different. And I have to admit, I always like the game: is he evil, is he not (until s.4: because he was all talk)

posted by: bookworm, May 24 2006


5. Sorry, but I couldn't agree less. For me, Eternity is one of the low points of the generally mixed S1.

posted by: Dingdong, Jul 28 2006


6. I don't mind parts of "Eternity," but as a whole I was never wild about it myself either. Although I think Ryan graded it pretty fairly (though I'd score it lower myself). Ryan already knows this, but I feel a bit different about S1 than he does. I feel, like DD said, it's a really mixed season in terms of quality. It is one of my least favorite Buffyverse seasons. The lack of any sort of cohesiveness in overall arc and theme really turned me off. If I ever do my own Angel reviews, you guys can expect, overall, lower scores.

posted by: mikejer, Jul 28 2006


7. What didn't you like about it?

"The lack of any sort of cohesiveness in overall arc and theme really turned me off."

Are you kidding? Lack of cohesiveness of theme?? Angel is 95% theme for crying out loud! ;)

posted by: Grounded, Jul 29 2006


8. Okay, you're right. It does have theme. But S1 doesn't have an arc and I find the quality of the episodes a lot more sketchy than Ryan does.

posted by: mikejer, Jul 29 2006


9. It doesn't have a blatantly obvious story arc, no, but I wouldn't class that as a negative factor. Besides, it's not completely arc-less. Both episodes 1 and 2 initiate sub-arcs that weave in and out of the standalones all the way up to the finale.

posted by: Grounded, Jul 29 2006


10. In answer to your question Grounded, I didn't like the mixed bag of quality, that resulted in "She", "The Ring", "Eternity", and "Expecting" plus a few episodes which disappointed slightly although generally being worthwhile. Ats seemed to start out with less of an overal arc, perhaps because it had series wide plans rather than season wide ones like Buffy.

Overall, I think the only really outstanding episodes in S1 are Five by Five and Sanctuary.

posted by: Dingdong, Jul 29 2006


11. I'd thrown "To Shanshu in LA" too Dingdong. I also liked "Blind Date" considerably. It's a 'good' season but I wouldn't classify it as 'great'.

posted by: mikejer, Jul 30 2006


12. I like To Shanshu in LA, but I've always considered it rather overrated, and I wouldn't classify it as standout. Nor Blind Date, even though that's pretty good in some ways. But for me, Five by Five is still my favourite episode of Angel, and Sanctuary isn't far behind. I actually think both are better than "Who are You", which is definately high praise for me.

posted by: Dingdong, Jul 30 2006


13. I agree She and Expecting aren't up there, but as standalones I think Eternity and The Ring are both excellent at what they do. Not outstanding, I agree, but still good.

Standouts from S1: City Of, In The Dark, Bachelor Party (come on - I'm a Doyle fan!), I Will Remember You, Hero, Somnambulist, I've Got You Under My Skin, Five By Five, Sanctuary, To Shanshu In LA

I agree with Ryan - aside from a few blips (and EVERY season of A and B has these), A1 is 80+ all the way. :D

posted by: Grounded, Jul 30 2006


14. And yet you think S5 is poor? I can't understand it!

Seriously, though, The Ring is utterly predictable. Also, pretty uncompelling and simplistic at points. Eternity had potential and a good idea, but failed to explore it very well, and turned into an excuse to bring back Angelus temporarily. The standalones you listed:

City Of, In The Dark, Bachelor Party (come on - I'm a Doyle fan!), I Will Remember You, Hero, Somnambulist, I've Got You Under My Skin, Five By Five, Sanctuary, To Shanshu In LA

City of is good, I agree, but I wouldn't say standout. It introduces the main theme and concept well but is flawed by some duff bits (Doyle's explanation of Angel's backstory) and a few bits where style takes over too much. In the Dark is the only S1 episode I haven't seen, so I won't comment, but The Bachelor Party is, although undeniably entertaining, rather flawed and cliched in some respects. Hero I like probably more than most Angel fans, but it can't be denied the principle villains are rather unsubtle in the metaphor and admittedly does bugger up continuity (not as much a problem with me as other fans, though) Somnambulist is probably one of the best episodes after Five by Five/Sancturary, but I remember some flaws in the way it was presented that brought it down slightly for me. I don't like I've Got You Under My Skin. Sorry, I know it's many people's favourites, but I just don't like it. That brings me to "To Shanshu in LA". For most people, it's one of the best finales, but I'm not sure why. It's very good in places, and has some powerful parts, but certain areas of the story fall flat to me. The Demon never really works, and Angel's reactions (or lack of) to his prophecied death aren't explored enough. And although admittedly exciting in places, it isn't really paced right.

The main problem I have with Ats S1 is not so much the overall lack of proper arc, so much as the fact that it both goes for an arc and goes for standalones. I personally feel it should have had definate standalones, and more arc-orientated episodes, instead of trying to mix the two. It always left me somewhat unsatisfied, and didn't really work as well as it should have. If you compare the standalones to Buffy's, they aren't nearly as accomplished. And the arc doesn't move along fast enough or cover enough ground to make up for this.

posted by: Dingdong, Jul 30 2006


15. "And yet you think S5 is poor? I can't understand it!"

Eh? When did I ever say that?

posted by: Grounded, Jul 30 2006


16. Sorry, I should have specified: Buffy S5.

posted by: Dingdong, Jul 30 2006


17. I don't hate B5, but it doesn't have a hell of a lot good going for it either. Didn't we just do the Glory dissection not long ago? ;)

posted by: Grounded, Jul 30 2006


18. Well, I thought Glory was the weakest thing about it, but I thought everything else was great. Glory didn't feature heavily in most episodes until Intervention, and the quality of the rest of the arc and the standalone material was excellent IMO.AeC

posted by: Dingdong, Jul 30 2006


19. (Aside from many other reasons, this is the major flaw of the Angelus arc in S4, as the demon is treated as a completely different entity within the same body as Angel, thereby violating canon and nullifying one of the most interesting and vital pieces to the necessity of Angel’s quest for redemption.)

I'd need to watch S4 again to be sure, but I always took the "distinct entity" route as more of a metaphorical distinction, a separate part of the whole that had to be subdued and brought into balance (although this treatment did initially bug me). To put it in Freudian terms, which I generally loathe although they do provide some nice shorthand, Angelus is the id, Angel's trapped soul is the superego, and the Angel that Angelus and Faith meet in Angel/Angelus' mind is the ego which, no longer having two conflicting impulses to mediate between, has become lost.

It could be argued that the "separate entity" theory has some precedence in "The Dark Age" from Buffy S2. When the demon jumps from Jenny into Angel, who handily defeats it, he comments that he's had a demon in him for a couple hundred years that's been waiting for a good fight.

posted by: AeC, Oct 13 2007


20. (Aside from many other reasons, this is the major flaw of the Angelus arc in S4, as the demon is treated as a completely different entity within the same body as Angel, thereby violating canon and nullifying one of the most interesting and vital pieces to the necessity of Angel’s quest for redemption.)

I'd need to watch S4 again to be sure, but I always took the "distinct entity" route as more of a metaphorical distinction, a separate part of the whole that had to be subdued and brought into balance (although this treatment did initially bug me). To put it in Freudian terms, which I generally loathe although they do provide some nice shorthand, Angelus is the id, Angel's trapped soul is the superego, and the Angel that Angelus and Faith meet in Angel/Angelus' mind is the ego which, no longer having two conflicting impulses to mediate between, has become lost.

It could be argued that the "separate entity" theory has some precedence in "The Dark Age" from Buffy S2. When the demon jumps from Jenny into Angel, who handily defeats it, he comments that he's had a demon in him for a couple hundred years that's been waiting for a good fight.

posted by: AeC, Oct 13 2007


Post a Comment

Name


(copy your comment in case of failure!)

Security Code
Security Code



Copyright © 2000-2008 SuperJer.com. All rights reserved.